Fair-price market calibration
These paper signals use prices calculated from the model's own probabilities. They measure calibration; they are not bookmaker quotes, available betting opportunities or proof of betting profit. See the separate bookmaker-price archive.
1950settled
1360pending
568void
Market archive
DENDELE vs Imperial
· totals_rounds 22.5
· map 1
· under
model 71%
fair price 1.40
model outcome: win
DENDELE vs Imperial
· totals_rounds 22.5
· map 1
· over
model 29%
fair price 3.50
model outcome: loss
ShindeN vs paiN
· handicap_maps 1.5
· paiN
model 75%
fair price 1.34
model outcome: loss
ShindeN vs paiN
· handicap_maps -1.5
· paiN
model 25%
fair price 4.07
model outcome: loss
ShindeN vs paiN
· handicap_maps 1.5
· ShindeN
model 75%
fair price 1.33
model outcome: win
ShindeN vs paiN
· handicap_maps -1.5
· ShindeN
model 25%
fair price 3.93
model outcome: win
ShindeN vs paiN
· totals_maps 2.5
· under
model 50%
fair price 2.00
model outcome: win
ShindeN vs paiN
· totals_maps 2.5
· over
model 50%
fair price 2.00
model outcome: loss
ShindeN vs paiN
· totals_rounds 22.5
· map 1
· under
model 71%
fair price 1.40
model outcome: win
ShindeN vs paiN
· totals_rounds 22.5
· map 1
· over
model 29%
fair price 3.50
model outcome: loss
Marsborne vs regain
· handicap_maps 1.5
· regain
model 67%
fair price 1.49
model outcome: win
Marsborne vs regain
· handicap_maps -1.5
· regain
model 18%
fair price 5.51
model outcome: loss
Marsborne vs regain
· handicap_maps 1.5
· Marsborne
model 82%
fair price 1.22
model outcome: win
Marsborne vs regain
· handicap_maps -1.5
· Marsborne
model 33%
fair price 3.04
model outcome: loss
Marsborne vs regain
· totals_maps 2.5
· under
model 51%
fair price 1.96
model outcome: win
Marsborne vs regain
· totals_maps 2.5
· over
model 49%
fair price 2.04
model outcome: loss
Marsborne vs regain
· totals_rounds 22.5
· map 1
· under
model 71%
fair price 1.42
model outcome: win
Marsborne vs regain
· totals_rounds 22.5
· map 1
· over
model 29%
fair price 3.40
model outcome: loss
Without a Roof vs LAG
· handicap_maps 1.5
· LAG
model 72%
fair price 1.38
model outcome: win
Without a Roof vs LAG
· handicap_maps -1.5
· LAG
model 23%
fair price 4.43
model outcome: loss
Without a Roof vs LAG
· handicap_maps 1.5
· Without a Roof
model 77%
fair price 1.29
model outcome: win
Without a Roof vs LAG
· handicap_maps -1.5
· Without a Roof
model 28%
fair price 3.63
model outcome: loss
Without a Roof vs LAG
· totals_maps 2.5
· under
model 50%
fair price 1.99
model outcome: loss
Without a Roof vs LAG
· totals_maps 2.5
· over
model 50%
fair price 2.01
model outcome: win
Without a Roof vs LAG
· totals_rounds 22.5
· map 1
· under
model 71%
fair price 1.42
model outcome: win
Without a Roof vs LAG
· totals_rounds 22.5
· map 1
· over
model 29%
fair price 3.40
model outcome: loss
Overtake Sector vs FarmVille
· handicap_maps 1.5
· FarmVille
model 72%
fair price 1.38
model outcome: loss
Overtake Sector vs FarmVille
· handicap_maps -1.5
· FarmVille
model 23%
fair price 4.43
model outcome: loss
Overtake Sector vs FarmVille
· handicap_maps 1.5
· Overtake Sector
model 77%
fair price 1.29
model outcome: win
Overtake Sector vs FarmVille
· handicap_maps -1.5
· Overtake Sector
model 28%
fair price 3.63
model outcome: win
Overtake Sector vs FarmVille
· totals_maps 2.5
· under
model 50%
fair price 1.99
model outcome: win
Overtake Sector vs FarmVille
· totals_maps 2.5
· over
model 50%
fair price 2.01
model outcome: loss
Overtake Sector vs FarmVille
· totals_rounds 22.5
· map 1
· under
model 70%
fair price 1.42
model outcome: loss
Overtake Sector vs FarmVille
· totals_rounds 22.5
· map 1
· over
model 30%
fair price 3.38
model outcome: win
Iowa Stormboar vs SportsBetExpert
· handicap_maps 1.5
· SportsBetExpert
model 75%
fair price 1.34
model outcome: win
Iowa Stormboar vs SportsBetExpert
· handicap_maps -1.5
· SportsBetExpert
model 25%
fair price 4.07
model outcome: win
Iowa Stormboar vs SportsBetExpert
· handicap_maps 1.5
· Iowa Stormboar
model 75%
fair price 1.33
model outcome: loss
Iowa Stormboar vs SportsBetExpert
· handicap_maps -1.5
· Iowa Stormboar
model 25%
fair price 3.93
model outcome: loss
Iowa Stormboar vs SportsBetExpert
· totals_maps 2.5
· under
model 50%
fair price 2.00
model outcome: win
Iowa Stormboar vs SportsBetExpert
· totals_maps 2.5
· over
model 50%
fair price 2.00
model outcome: loss
Iowa Stormboar vs SportsBetExpert
· totals_rounds 22.5
· map 1
· under
model 71%
fair price 1.40
model outcome: win
Iowa Stormboar vs SportsBetExpert
· totals_rounds 22.5
· map 1
· over
model 29%
fair price 3.50
model outcome: loss
Back to Back vs Fluxo
· handicap_maps 1.5
· Fluxo
model 75%
fair price 1.34
model outcome: win
Back to Back vs Fluxo
· handicap_maps -1.5
· Fluxo
model 25%
fair price 4.07
model outcome: loss
Back to Back vs Fluxo
· handicap_maps 1.5
· Back to Back
model 75%
fair price 1.33
model outcome: win
Back to Back vs Fluxo
· handicap_maps -1.5
· Back to Back
model 25%
fair price 3.93
model outcome: loss
Back to Back vs Fluxo
· totals_maps 2.5
· under
model 50%
fair price 2.00
model outcome: loss
Back to Back vs Fluxo
· totals_maps 2.5
· over
model 50%
fair price 2.00
model outcome: win
Back to Back vs Fluxo
· totals_rounds 22.5
· map 1
· under
model 71%
fair price 1.40
model outcome: win
Back to Back vs Fluxo
· totals_rounds 22.5
· map 1
· over
model 29%
fair price 3.50
model outcome: loss
WBT vs SAW
· handicap_maps 1.5
· SAW
model 67%
fair price 1.49
model outcome: win
WBT vs SAW
· handicap_maps -1.5
· SAW
model 18%
fair price 5.47
model outcome: win
WBT vs SAW
· handicap_maps 1.5
· WBT
model 82%
fair price 1.22
model outcome: loss
WBT vs SAW
· handicap_maps -1.5
· WBT
model 33%
fair price 3.05
model outcome: loss
WBT vs SAW
· totals_maps 2.5
· under
model 51%
fair price 1.96
model outcome: win
WBT vs SAW
· totals_maps 2.5
· over
model 49%
fair price 2.04
model outcome: loss
WBT vs SAW
· totals_rounds 22.5
· map 1
· under
model 70%
fair price 1.42
model outcome: loss
WBT vs SAW
· totals_rounds 22.5
· map 1
· over
model 30%
fair price 3.37
model outcome: win
1win vs Ninjas in Pyjamas
· handicap_maps 1.5
· Ninjas in Pyjamas
model 73%
fair price 1.38
model outcome: win
1win vs Ninjas in Pyjamas
· handicap_maps -1.5
· Ninjas in Pyjamas
model 23%
fair price 4.42
model outcome: loss
1win vs Ninjas in Pyjamas
· handicap_maps 1.5
· 1win
model 77%
fair price 1.29
model outcome: win
1win vs Ninjas in Pyjamas
· handicap_maps -1.5
· 1win
model 27%
fair price 3.64
model outcome: loss
1win vs Ninjas in Pyjamas
· totals_maps 2.5
· under
model 50%
fair price 2.00
model outcome: loss
1win vs Ninjas in Pyjamas
· totals_maps 2.5
· over
model 50%
fair price 2.00
model outcome: win
1win vs Ninjas in Pyjamas
· totals_rounds 22.5
· map 1
· under
model 70%
fair price 1.42
model outcome: win
1win vs Ninjas in Pyjamas
· totals_rounds 22.5
· map 1
· over
model 30%
fair price 3.37
model outcome: loss
3DMAX vs 100 Thieves
· handicap_maps 1.5
· 100 Thieves
model 73%
fair price 1.38
model outcome: win
3DMAX vs 100 Thieves
· handicap_maps -1.5
· 100 Thieves
model 23%
fair price 4.42
model outcome: win
3DMAX vs 100 Thieves
· handicap_maps 1.5
· 3DMAX
model 77%
fair price 1.29
model outcome: loss
3DMAX vs 100 Thieves
· handicap_maps -1.5
· 3DMAX
model 27%
fair price 3.64
model outcome: loss
3DMAX vs 100 Thieves
· totals_maps 2.5
· under
model 50%
fair price 2.00
model outcome: win
3DMAX vs 100 Thieves
· totals_maps 2.5
· over
model 50%
fair price 2.00
model outcome: loss
3DMAX vs 100 Thieves
· totals_rounds 22.5
· map 1
· under
model 72%
fair price 1.40
model outcome: win
3DMAX vs 100 Thieves
· totals_rounds 22.5
· map 1
· over
model 28%
fair price 3.51
model outcome: loss
1win vs Nemiga
· handicap_maps 1.5
· Nemiga
model 73%
fair price 1.38
model outcome: win
1win vs Nemiga
· handicap_maps -1.5
· Nemiga
model 23%
fair price 4.42
model outcome: win
1win vs Nemiga
· handicap_maps 1.5
· 1win
model 77%
fair price 1.29
model outcome: loss
1win vs Nemiga
· handicap_maps -1.5
· 1win
model 27%
fair price 3.64
model outcome: loss
1win vs Nemiga
· totals_maps 2.5
· under
model 50%
fair price 2.00
model outcome: win
1win vs Nemiga
· totals_maps 2.5
· over
model 50%
fair price 2.00
model outcome: loss
1win vs Nemiga
· totals_rounds 22.5
· map 1
· under
model 72%
fair price 1.40
model outcome: win
1win vs Nemiga
· totals_rounds 22.5
· map 1
· over
model 28%
fair price 3.51
model outcome: loss
Nemesis vs Wildcard
· handicap_maps 1.5
· Wildcard
model 73%
fair price 1.38
model outcome: win
Nemesis vs Wildcard
· handicap_maps -1.5
· Wildcard
model 23%
fair price 4.42
model outcome: win
Nemesis vs Wildcard
· handicap_maps 1.5
· Nemesis
model 77%
fair price 1.29
model outcome: loss
Nemesis vs Wildcard
· handicap_maps -1.5
· Nemesis
model 27%
fair price 3.64
model outcome: loss
Nemesis vs Wildcard
· totals_maps 2.5
· under
model 50%
fair price 2.00
model outcome: win
Nemesis vs Wildcard
· totals_maps 2.5
· over
model 50%
fair price 2.00
model outcome: loss
Nemesis vs Wildcard
· totals_rounds 22.5
· map 1
· under
model 70%
fair price 1.42
model outcome: win
Nemesis vs Wildcard
· totals_rounds 22.5
· map 1
· over
model 30%
fair price 3.37
model outcome: loss
Nuclear TigeRES vs SINNERS
· handicap_maps 1.5
· SINNERS
model 67%
fair price 1.49
model outcome: loss
Nuclear TigeRES vs SINNERS
· handicap_maps -1.5
· SINNERS
model 18%
fair price 5.47
model outcome: loss
Nuclear TigeRES vs SINNERS
· handicap_maps 1.5
· Nuclear TigeRES
model 82%
fair price 1.22
model outcome: win
Nuclear TigeRES vs SINNERS
· handicap_maps -1.5
· Nuclear TigeRES
model 33%
fair price 3.05
model outcome: win
Nuclear TigeRES vs SINNERS
· totals_maps 2.5
· under
model 51%
fair price 1.96
model outcome: win
Nuclear TigeRES vs SINNERS
· totals_maps 2.5
· over
model 49%
fair price 2.04
model outcome: loss
Nuclear TigeRES vs SINNERS
· totals_rounds 22.5
· map 1
· under
model 70%
fair price 1.42
model outcome: win
Nuclear TigeRES vs SINNERS
· totals_rounds 22.5
· map 1
· over
model 30%
fair price 3.37
model outcome: loss
K27 vs Virtus.pro
· handicap_maps 1.5
· Virtus.pro
model 73%
fair price 1.38
model outcome: win
K27 vs Virtus.pro
· handicap_maps -1.5
· Virtus.pro
model 23%
fair price 4.42
model outcome: win