Fair-price market calibration

These paper signals use prices calculated from the model's own probabilities. They measure calibration; they are not bookmaker quotes, available betting opportunities or proof of betting profit. See the separate bookmaker-price archive.

1950settled
1360pending
568void

Market archive

DENDELE vs Imperial · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · under model 71% fair price 1.40 model outcome: win DENDELE vs Imperial · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · over model 29% fair price 3.50 model outcome: loss ShindeN vs paiN · handicap_maps 1.5 · paiN model 75% fair price 1.34 model outcome: loss ShindeN vs paiN · handicap_maps -1.5 · paiN model 25% fair price 4.07 model outcome: loss ShindeN vs paiN · handicap_maps 1.5 · ShindeN model 75% fair price 1.33 model outcome: win ShindeN vs paiN · handicap_maps -1.5 · ShindeN model 25% fair price 3.93 model outcome: win ShindeN vs paiN · totals_maps 2.5 · under model 50% fair price 2.00 model outcome: win ShindeN vs paiN · totals_maps 2.5 · over model 50% fair price 2.00 model outcome: loss ShindeN vs paiN · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · under model 71% fair price 1.40 model outcome: win ShindeN vs paiN · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · over model 29% fair price 3.50 model outcome: loss Marsborne vs regain · handicap_maps 1.5 · regain model 67% fair price 1.49 model outcome: win Marsborne vs regain · handicap_maps -1.5 · regain model 18% fair price 5.51 model outcome: loss Marsborne vs regain · handicap_maps 1.5 · Marsborne model 82% fair price 1.22 model outcome: win Marsborne vs regain · handicap_maps -1.5 · Marsborne model 33% fair price 3.04 model outcome: loss Marsborne vs regain · totals_maps 2.5 · under model 51% fair price 1.96 model outcome: win Marsborne vs regain · totals_maps 2.5 · over model 49% fair price 2.04 model outcome: loss Marsborne vs regain · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · under model 71% fair price 1.42 model outcome: win Marsborne vs regain · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · over model 29% fair price 3.40 model outcome: loss Without a Roof vs LAG · handicap_maps 1.5 · LAG model 72% fair price 1.38 model outcome: win Without a Roof vs LAG · handicap_maps -1.5 · LAG model 23% fair price 4.43 model outcome: loss Without a Roof vs LAG · handicap_maps 1.5 · Without a Roof model 77% fair price 1.29 model outcome: win Without a Roof vs LAG · handicap_maps -1.5 · Without a Roof model 28% fair price 3.63 model outcome: loss Without a Roof vs LAG · totals_maps 2.5 · under model 50% fair price 1.99 model outcome: loss Without a Roof vs LAG · totals_maps 2.5 · over model 50% fair price 2.01 model outcome: win Without a Roof vs LAG · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · under model 71% fair price 1.42 model outcome: win Without a Roof vs LAG · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · over model 29% fair price 3.40 model outcome: loss Overtake Sector vs FarmVille · handicap_maps 1.5 · FarmVille model 72% fair price 1.38 model outcome: loss Overtake Sector vs FarmVille · handicap_maps -1.5 · FarmVille model 23% fair price 4.43 model outcome: loss Overtake Sector vs FarmVille · handicap_maps 1.5 · Overtake Sector model 77% fair price 1.29 model outcome: win Overtake Sector vs FarmVille · handicap_maps -1.5 · Overtake Sector model 28% fair price 3.63 model outcome: win Overtake Sector vs FarmVille · totals_maps 2.5 · under model 50% fair price 1.99 model outcome: win Overtake Sector vs FarmVille · totals_maps 2.5 · over model 50% fair price 2.01 model outcome: loss Overtake Sector vs FarmVille · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · under model 70% fair price 1.42 model outcome: loss Overtake Sector vs FarmVille · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · over model 30% fair price 3.38 model outcome: win Iowa Stormboar vs SportsBetExpert · handicap_maps 1.5 · SportsBetExpert model 75% fair price 1.34 model outcome: win Iowa Stormboar vs SportsBetExpert · handicap_maps -1.5 · SportsBetExpert model 25% fair price 4.07 model outcome: win Iowa Stormboar vs SportsBetExpert · handicap_maps 1.5 · Iowa Stormboar model 75% fair price 1.33 model outcome: loss Iowa Stormboar vs SportsBetExpert · handicap_maps -1.5 · Iowa Stormboar model 25% fair price 3.93 model outcome: loss Iowa Stormboar vs SportsBetExpert · totals_maps 2.5 · under model 50% fair price 2.00 model outcome: win Iowa Stormboar vs SportsBetExpert · totals_maps 2.5 · over model 50% fair price 2.00 model outcome: loss Iowa Stormboar vs SportsBetExpert · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · under model 71% fair price 1.40 model outcome: win Iowa Stormboar vs SportsBetExpert · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · over model 29% fair price 3.50 model outcome: loss Back to Back vs Fluxo · handicap_maps 1.5 · Fluxo model 75% fair price 1.34 model outcome: win Back to Back vs Fluxo · handicap_maps -1.5 · Fluxo model 25% fair price 4.07 model outcome: loss Back to Back vs Fluxo · handicap_maps 1.5 · Back to Back model 75% fair price 1.33 model outcome: win Back to Back vs Fluxo · handicap_maps -1.5 · Back to Back model 25% fair price 3.93 model outcome: loss Back to Back vs Fluxo · totals_maps 2.5 · under model 50% fair price 2.00 model outcome: loss Back to Back vs Fluxo · totals_maps 2.5 · over model 50% fair price 2.00 model outcome: win Back to Back vs Fluxo · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · under model 71% fair price 1.40 model outcome: win Back to Back vs Fluxo · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · over model 29% fair price 3.50 model outcome: loss WBT vs SAW · handicap_maps 1.5 · SAW model 67% fair price 1.49 model outcome: win WBT vs SAW · handicap_maps -1.5 · SAW model 18% fair price 5.47 model outcome: win WBT vs SAW · handicap_maps 1.5 · WBT model 82% fair price 1.22 model outcome: loss WBT vs SAW · handicap_maps -1.5 · WBT model 33% fair price 3.05 model outcome: loss WBT vs SAW · totals_maps 2.5 · under model 51% fair price 1.96 model outcome: win WBT vs SAW · totals_maps 2.5 · over model 49% fair price 2.04 model outcome: loss WBT vs SAW · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · under model 70% fair price 1.42 model outcome: loss WBT vs SAW · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · over model 30% fair price 3.37 model outcome: win 1win vs Ninjas in Pyjamas · handicap_maps 1.5 · Ninjas in Pyjamas model 73% fair price 1.38 model outcome: win 1win vs Ninjas in Pyjamas · handicap_maps -1.5 · Ninjas in Pyjamas model 23% fair price 4.42 model outcome: loss 1win vs Ninjas in Pyjamas · handicap_maps 1.5 · 1win model 77% fair price 1.29 model outcome: win 1win vs Ninjas in Pyjamas · handicap_maps -1.5 · 1win model 27% fair price 3.64 model outcome: loss 1win vs Ninjas in Pyjamas · totals_maps 2.5 · under model 50% fair price 2.00 model outcome: loss 1win vs Ninjas in Pyjamas · totals_maps 2.5 · over model 50% fair price 2.00 model outcome: win 1win vs Ninjas in Pyjamas · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · under model 70% fair price 1.42 model outcome: win 1win vs Ninjas in Pyjamas · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · over model 30% fair price 3.37 model outcome: loss 3DMAX vs 100 Thieves · handicap_maps 1.5 · 100 Thieves model 73% fair price 1.38 model outcome: win 3DMAX vs 100 Thieves · handicap_maps -1.5 · 100 Thieves model 23% fair price 4.42 model outcome: win 3DMAX vs 100 Thieves · handicap_maps 1.5 · 3DMAX model 77% fair price 1.29 model outcome: loss 3DMAX vs 100 Thieves · handicap_maps -1.5 · 3DMAX model 27% fair price 3.64 model outcome: loss 3DMAX vs 100 Thieves · totals_maps 2.5 · under model 50% fair price 2.00 model outcome: win 3DMAX vs 100 Thieves · totals_maps 2.5 · over model 50% fair price 2.00 model outcome: loss 3DMAX vs 100 Thieves · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · under model 72% fair price 1.40 model outcome: win 3DMAX vs 100 Thieves · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · over model 28% fair price 3.51 model outcome: loss 1win vs Nemiga · handicap_maps 1.5 · Nemiga model 73% fair price 1.38 model outcome: win 1win vs Nemiga · handicap_maps -1.5 · Nemiga model 23% fair price 4.42 model outcome: win 1win vs Nemiga · handicap_maps 1.5 · 1win model 77% fair price 1.29 model outcome: loss 1win vs Nemiga · handicap_maps -1.5 · 1win model 27% fair price 3.64 model outcome: loss 1win vs Nemiga · totals_maps 2.5 · under model 50% fair price 2.00 model outcome: win 1win vs Nemiga · totals_maps 2.5 · over model 50% fair price 2.00 model outcome: loss 1win vs Nemiga · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · under model 72% fair price 1.40 model outcome: win 1win vs Nemiga · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · over model 28% fair price 3.51 model outcome: loss Nemesis vs Wildcard · handicap_maps 1.5 · Wildcard model 73% fair price 1.38 model outcome: win Nemesis vs Wildcard · handicap_maps -1.5 · Wildcard model 23% fair price 4.42 model outcome: win Nemesis vs Wildcard · handicap_maps 1.5 · Nemesis model 77% fair price 1.29 model outcome: loss Nemesis vs Wildcard · handicap_maps -1.5 · Nemesis model 27% fair price 3.64 model outcome: loss Nemesis vs Wildcard · totals_maps 2.5 · under model 50% fair price 2.00 model outcome: win Nemesis vs Wildcard · totals_maps 2.5 · over model 50% fair price 2.00 model outcome: loss Nemesis vs Wildcard · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · under model 70% fair price 1.42 model outcome: win Nemesis vs Wildcard · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · over model 30% fair price 3.37 model outcome: loss Nuclear TigeRES vs SINNERS · handicap_maps 1.5 · SINNERS model 67% fair price 1.49 model outcome: loss Nuclear TigeRES vs SINNERS · handicap_maps -1.5 · SINNERS model 18% fair price 5.47 model outcome: loss Nuclear TigeRES vs SINNERS · handicap_maps 1.5 · Nuclear TigeRES model 82% fair price 1.22 model outcome: win Nuclear TigeRES vs SINNERS · handicap_maps -1.5 · Nuclear TigeRES model 33% fair price 3.05 model outcome: win Nuclear TigeRES vs SINNERS · totals_maps 2.5 · under model 51% fair price 1.96 model outcome: win Nuclear TigeRES vs SINNERS · totals_maps 2.5 · over model 49% fair price 2.04 model outcome: loss Nuclear TigeRES vs SINNERS · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · under model 70% fair price 1.42 model outcome: win Nuclear TigeRES vs SINNERS · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · over model 30% fair price 3.37 model outcome: loss K27 vs Virtus.pro · handicap_maps 1.5 · Virtus.pro model 73% fair price 1.38 model outcome: win K27 vs Virtus.pro · handicap_maps -1.5 · Virtus.pro model 23% fair price 4.42 model outcome: win