Fair-price market calibration

These paper signals use prices calculated from the model's own probabilities. They measure calibration; they are not bookmaker quotes, available betting opportunities or proof of betting profit. See the separate bookmaker-price archive.

1950settled
1360pending
568void

Market archive

K27 vs Virtus.pro · handicap_maps 1.5 · K27 model 77% fair price 1.29 model outcome: loss K27 vs Virtus.pro · handicap_maps -1.5 · K27 model 27% fair price 3.64 model outcome: loss K27 vs Virtus.pro · totals_maps 2.5 · under model 50% fair price 2.00 model outcome: win K27 vs Virtus.pro · totals_maps 2.5 · over model 50% fair price 2.00 model outcome: loss K27 vs Virtus.pro · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · under model 70% fair price 1.42 model outcome: loss K27 vs Virtus.pro · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · over model 30% fair price 3.37 model outcome: win Honvéd vs Teletubisie · handicap_maps 1.5 · Teletubisie model 67% fair price 1.49 model outcome: win Honvéd vs Teletubisie · handicap_maps -1.5 · Teletubisie model 18% fair price 5.48 model outcome: loss Honvéd vs Teletubisie · handicap_maps 1.5 · Honvéd model 82% fair price 1.22 model outcome: win Honvéd vs Teletubisie · handicap_maps -1.5 · Honvéd model 33% fair price 3.05 model outcome: loss Honvéd vs Teletubisie · totals_maps 2.5 · under model 51% fair price 1.96 model outcome: loss Honvéd vs Teletubisie · totals_maps 2.5 · over model 49% fair price 2.04 model outcome: win Honvéd vs Teletubisie · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · under model 70% fair price 1.42 model outcome: win Honvéd vs Teletubisie · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · over model 30% fair price 3.38 model outcome: loss Nemiga vs Just Players · handicap_maps 1.5 · Just Players model 67% fair price 1.49 model outcome: loss Nemiga vs Just Players · handicap_maps -1.5 · Just Players model 18% fair price 5.48 model outcome: loss Nemiga vs Just Players · handicap_maps 1.5 · Nemiga model 82% fair price 1.22 model outcome: win Nemiga vs Just Players · handicap_maps -1.5 · Nemiga model 33% fair price 3.05 model outcome: win Nemiga vs Just Players · totals_maps 2.5 · under model 51% fair price 1.96 model outcome: win Nemiga vs Just Players · totals_maps 2.5 · over model 49% fair price 2.04 model outcome: loss Nemiga vs Just Players · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · under model 70% fair price 1.42 model outcome: win Nemiga vs Just Players · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · over model 30% fair price 3.38 model outcome: loss FOKUS vs Leo · handicap_maps 1.5 · Leo model 67% fair price 1.49 void: start_time_missing FOKUS vs Leo · handicap_maps -1.5 · Leo model 18% fair price 5.48 void: start_time_missing FOKUS vs Leo · handicap_maps 1.5 · FOKUS model 82% fair price 1.22 void: start_time_missing FOKUS vs Leo · handicap_maps -1.5 · FOKUS model 33% fair price 3.05 void: start_time_missing FOKUS vs Leo · totals_maps 2.5 · under model 51% fair price 1.96 void: start_time_missing FOKUS vs Leo · totals_maps 2.5 · over model 49% fair price 2.04 void: start_time_missing FOKUS vs Leo · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · under model 70% fair price 1.42 void: start_time_missing FOKUS vs Leo · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · over model 30% fair price 3.38 void: start_time_missing Color vs SPARTA · handicap_maps 1.5 · SPARTA model 67% fair price 1.49 model outcome: win Color vs SPARTA · handicap_maps -1.5 · SPARTA model 18% fair price 5.48 model outcome: loss Color vs SPARTA · handicap_maps 1.5 · Color model 82% fair price 1.22 model outcome: win Color vs SPARTA · handicap_maps -1.5 · Color model 33% fair price 3.05 model outcome: loss Color vs SPARTA · totals_maps 2.5 · under model 51% fair price 1.96 model outcome: loss Color vs SPARTA · totals_maps 2.5 · over model 49% fair price 2.04 model outcome: win Color vs SPARTA · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · under model 70% fair price 1.42 model outcome: win Color vs SPARTA · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · over model 30% fair price 3.38 model outcome: loss Sashi vs PCIFIC · handicap_maps 1.5 · PCIFIC model 67% fair price 1.49 model outcome: win Sashi vs PCIFIC · handicap_maps -1.5 · PCIFIC model 18% fair price 5.48 model outcome: loss Sashi vs PCIFIC · handicap_maps 1.5 · Sashi model 82% fair price 1.22 model outcome: win Sashi vs PCIFIC · handicap_maps -1.5 · Sashi model 33% fair price 3.05 model outcome: loss Sashi vs PCIFIC · totals_maps 2.5 · under model 51% fair price 1.96 model outcome: loss Sashi vs PCIFIC · totals_maps 2.5 · over model 49% fair price 2.04 model outcome: win Sashi vs PCIFIC · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · under model 70% fair price 1.42 model outcome: win Sashi vs PCIFIC · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · over model 30% fair price 3.38 model outcome: loss Banda Chuya vs LPH · handicap_maps 1.5 · LPH model 83% fair price 1.20 model outcome: win Banda Chuya vs LPH · handicap_maps -1.5 · LPH model 35% fair price 2.86 model outcome: loss Banda Chuya vs LPH · handicap_maps 1.5 · Banda Chuya model 65% fair price 1.54 model outcome: win Banda Chuya vs LPH · handicap_maps -1.5 · Banda Chuya model 17% fair price 6.00 model outcome: loss Banda Chuya vs LPH · totals_maps 2.5 · under model 52% fair price 1.93 model outcome: loss Banda Chuya vs LPH · totals_maps 2.5 · over model 48% fair price 2.07 model outcome: win Banda Chuya vs LPH · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · under model 72% fair price 1.38 model outcome: win Banda Chuya vs LPH · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · over model 28% fair price 3.63 model outcome: loss Falcons Force vs NAVI Junior · handicap_maps 1.5 · NAVI Junior model 75% fair price 1.34 model outcome: loss Falcons Force vs NAVI Junior · handicap_maps -1.5 · NAVI Junior model 25% fair price 4.07 model outcome: loss Falcons Force vs NAVI Junior · handicap_maps 1.5 · Falcons Force model 75% fair price 1.33 model outcome: win Falcons Force vs NAVI Junior · handicap_maps -1.5 · Falcons Force model 25% fair price 3.93 model outcome: win Falcons Force vs NAVI Junior · totals_maps 2.5 · under model 50% fair price 2.00 model outcome: win Falcons Force vs NAVI Junior · totals_maps 2.5 · over model 50% fair price 2.00 model outcome: loss Falcons Force vs NAVI Junior · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · under model 72% fair price 1.40 model outcome: win Falcons Force vs NAVI Junior · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · over model 28% fair price 3.51 model outcome: loss Walczaki vs ex-Zero Tenacity · handicap_maps 1.5 · ex-Zero Tenacity model 73% fair price 1.38 model outcome: win Walczaki vs ex-Zero Tenacity · handicap_maps -1.5 · ex-Zero Tenacity model 23% fair price 4.42 model outcome: loss Walczaki vs ex-Zero Tenacity · handicap_maps 1.5 · Walczaki model 77% fair price 1.29 model outcome: win Walczaki vs ex-Zero Tenacity · handicap_maps -1.5 · Walczaki model 27% fair price 3.64 model outcome: loss Walczaki vs ex-Zero Tenacity · totals_maps 2.5 · under model 50% fair price 2.00 model outcome: win Walczaki vs ex-Zero Tenacity · totals_maps 2.5 · over model 50% fair price 2.00 model outcome: loss Walczaki vs ex-Zero Tenacity · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · under model 72% fair price 1.40 model outcome: win Walczaki vs ex-Zero Tenacity · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · over model 28% fair price 3.51 model outcome: loss Acend vs INOX Division · handicap_maps 1.5 · INOX Division model 75% fair price 1.34 model outcome: win Acend vs INOX Division · handicap_maps -1.5 · INOX Division model 25% fair price 4.07 model outcome: loss Acend vs INOX Division · handicap_maps 1.5 · Acend model 75% fair price 1.33 model outcome: win Acend vs INOX Division · handicap_maps -1.5 · Acend model 25% fair price 3.93 model outcome: loss Acend vs INOX Division · totals_maps 2.5 · under model 50% fair price 2.00 model outcome: loss Acend vs INOX Division · totals_maps 2.5 · over model 50% fair price 2.00 model outcome: win Acend vs INOX Division · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · under model 72% fair price 1.40 model outcome: win Acend vs INOX Division · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · over model 28% fair price 3.51 model outcome: loss Metizport vs Lavked · handicap_maps 1.5 · Lavked model 67% fair price 1.49 model outcome: loss Metizport vs Lavked · handicap_maps -1.5 · Lavked model 18% fair price 5.48 model outcome: loss Metizport vs Lavked · handicap_maps 1.5 · Metizport model 82% fair price 1.22 model outcome: win Metizport vs Lavked · handicap_maps -1.5 · Metizport model 33% fair price 3.05 model outcome: win Metizport vs Lavked · totals_maps 2.5 · under model 51% fair price 1.96 model outcome: win Metizport vs Lavked · totals_maps 2.5 · over model 49% fair price 2.04 model outcome: loss Metizport vs Lavked · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · under model 70% fair price 1.42 model outcome: loss Metizport vs Lavked · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · over model 30% fair price 3.38 model outcome: win SINNERS vs The Last Resort · handicap_maps 1.5 · The Last Resort model 67% fair price 1.49 model outcome: loss SINNERS vs The Last Resort · handicap_maps -1.5 · The Last Resort model 18% fair price 5.48 model outcome: loss SINNERS vs The Last Resort · handicap_maps 1.5 · SINNERS model 82% fair price 1.22 model outcome: win SINNERS vs The Last Resort · handicap_maps -1.5 · SINNERS model 33% fair price 3.05 model outcome: win SINNERS vs The Last Resort · totals_maps 2.5 · under model 51% fair price 1.96 model outcome: win SINNERS vs The Last Resort · totals_maps 2.5 · over model 49% fair price 2.04 model outcome: loss SINNERS vs The Last Resort · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · under model 70% fair price 1.42 model outcome: win SINNERS vs The Last Resort · totals_rounds 22.5 · map 1 · over model 30% fair price 3.38 model outcome: loss SINQU vs Misa · handicap_maps 1.5 · Misa model 75% fair price 1.34 model outcome: win SINQU vs Misa · handicap_maps -1.5 · Misa model 25% fair price 4.07 model outcome: loss SINQU vs Misa · handicap_maps 1.5 · SINQU model 75% fair price 1.33 model outcome: win SINQU vs Misa · handicap_maps -1.5 · SINQU model 25% fair price 3.93 model outcome: loss SINQU vs Misa · totals_maps 2.5 · under model 50% fair price 2.00 model outcome: loss SINQU vs Misa · totals_maps 2.5 · over model 50% fair price 2.00 model outcome: win